![]() Since the invention of the Brace it's been one copycat after another and most aren't successful in getting approval. We are still thinking of the ATF as the enemy when the real enemy is a lack of imagination to address the problem of stabilizing the sight picture with no stock held to the shoulder. ![]() Well take it up with the ATF and write them a letter. (And yeah I do recognize some would immediately think vertical forward grip. I've read dozens of posts arguing VFG's and how much vertical slant and projection will trip the ATF's radar, but almost zilch on how to attach the sling to the front of the handguard and use IT for a forward stop. ![]() I've seen dozens of braces/cheek rests/whatever in this forum for years now, but rarely if ever a sling set up to keep recoil at a minimum bracing the weapon forward. So, why not just shoot nose to the charging handle and brace forward to keep the minor recoil from bothering you? The reason "pistol" diameter tubes sell is for guys like me who can then prevent someone from just shoving a stock on it to create an issue.Īs for the thin blade hanging down, as far as it being a shoulder rest the thinner you make it the more uncomfortable. As far as pistols are concerned, you could use a milspec adjustable M4 tube.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
June 2023
Categories |